2012 ©
             Publication
Journal Publication
Title of Article A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Identifying Out-of-date Systematic Reviews 
Date of Acceptance 20 October 2012 
Journal
     Title of Journal PLos ONE 
     Standard  
     Institute of Journal PLos ONE 
     ISBN/ISSN  
     Volume
     Issue 11 
     Month November
     Year of Publication 2012 
     Page e48894 
     Abstract Background Systematic reviews (SRs) can provide accurate and reliable evidence, typically about the effectiveness of health interventions. Evidence is dynamic, and if SRs are out-of-date this information may not be useful; it may even be harmful. This study aimed to compare five statistical methods to identify out-of-date SRs. Methods A retrospective cohort of SRs registered in the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group (CPCG), published between 2008 and 2010, were considered for inclusion. For each eligible CPCG review, data were extracted and “3-years previous” meta-analyses were assessed for the need to update, given the data from the most recent 3 years. Each of the five statistical methods was used, with random effects analyses throughout the study. Results Eighty reviews were included in this study; most were in the area of induction of labour. The numbers of reviews identified as being out-of-date using the Ottawa, recursive cumulative meta-analysis (CMA), and Barrowman methods were 34, 7, and 7 respectively. No reviews were identified as being out-of-date using the simulation-based power method, or the CMA for sufficiency and stability method. The overall agreement among the three discriminating statistical methods was slight (Kappa = 0.14; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.23). The recursive cumulative meta-analysis, Ottawa, and Barrowman methods were practical according to the study criteria. Conclusion Our study shows that three practical statistical methods could be applied to examine the need to update SRs. 
     Keyword systematic review, statistical methods, out-of-date 
Author
527100012-2 Miss PORJAI PATTANITTUM [Main Author]
Graduate School Doctoral Degree

Reviewing Status มีผู้ประเมินอิสระ 
Status ตีพิมพ์แล้ว 
Level of Publication นานาชาติ 
citation true 
Part of thesis true 
Attach file
Citation 0