|
|
ข้อมูลการเผยแพร่ผลงาน
|
| ชื่อบทความที่เผยแพร่ |
Prevalence of Chronic Ankle instability in Collegiate Athletes: The International Ankle Consortium Diagnostic Criteria |
| วัน/เดือน/ปี ที่เผยแพร่ |
5 กรกฎาคม 2562 |
| การประชุม |
| ชื่อการประชุม |
24th Annual Congress: European College of Sport Science |
| หน่วยงาน/องค์กรที่จัดประชุม |
Charles University |
| สถานที่จัดประชุม |
Prague Congress Centre |
| จังหวัด/รัฐ |
Prague, Czech Republic |
| ช่วงวันที่จัดประชุม |
3 กรกฎาคม 2562 |
| ถึง |
6 กรกฎาคม 2562 |
| Proceeding Paper |
| Volume (ปีที่) |
2019 |
| Issue (เล่มที่) |
- |
| หน้าที่พิมพ์ |
400 |
| Editors/edition/publisher |
|
| บทคัดย่อ |
PREVALENCE OF CHRONIC ANKLE INSTABILITY IN COLLEGIATE ATHLETES: THE INTERNATIONAL ANKLE CONSORTIUM
DIAGNOSED CRITERIA
UDOMPANICH, N.1,2, HUNSAWONG, T.1,2, PHADUNGKIT, S.1,2, TIPSORN, W.2, SOPARAK, B.2, JAROONRAK, S.2
1: BNOJPH , 2: KKU
INTRODUCTION: Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is a result of recurrent lateral ankle sprains (LAS) and thereby leading to an early onset of
ankle osteoarthritis (Gribble et al., 2014). Over the last 2 decades, an inconclusive definition and diagnosed criteria of CAI was conducted
in the previous study resulting in an inconsistent prevalence of CAI with a range from 23 to 58% among athletic populations (Tanen et al.,
2014; Simon et al., 2014; Mehta et al., 2015). Therefore, in 2014, The International Ankle Consortium provided a standard minimum of
diagnosed criteria for CAI (Gribble et al., 2014). However, there is a lack of study observed the prevalence of CAI under the current criteria
and there is no report demonstrated whether the difference in diagnosed criteria affects the prevalence of CAI. Hence, the present study
determined the point prevalence of CAI using the standard minimum of diagnosed criteria and compared the finding with the previous
reports.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on collegiate athletes including soccer, running, volleyball, basketball and badminton
players (mean age 21 ± 1.56 years). Participants completed a demographic data sheet, history of LAS and the Cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT). Participants who met the following criteria including 1) had multiple LAS, 2) had the history of first LAS at least 12 months, 3)
had the latest LAS at least 3 months, and 4) have a score < 24 on CAIT were diagnosed CAI (Gribble et al., 2014). One sample proportion
test was used to compare the prevalence of CAI with the recruited previous reports.
RESULTS: Among a hundred participants, 9 participants have developed CAI estimated as 9% prevalence from the total participants (95%
CI: 3.29-14.7). The highest prevalence of CAI was found in running, volleyball and soccer players, respectively. However, CAI was not
found in basketball and badminton players. There were 3 previous reports recruited for analysis (Tanen et al., 2014; Simon et al., 2014;
Mehta et al., 2015). The prevalence of CAI in this study was significantly lower than that in all previous reports (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Regarding the diagnosed criteria among the studies, the present study used the standard minimum diagnosed criteria of
The International Ankle Consortium. While the previous study (Simon et al., 2014; Mehta et al., 2015) applied only a questionnaire such as
CAIT and Identification Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI) for diagnosing CAI. The present findings suggest that the variation of diagnosed
criteria among the studies affect the prevalence of CAI. Therefore, further study should apply the standard minimum of criteria for providing more consistent characteristics of CAI participants to enhance the strength of research in CAI population.
REFERENCES
1.Gribble PA et al., (2014). Br J Sports Med, 48, 1014-1018.
2.Tanen L et al., (2014). Foot Ankle Spec, 7, 37-44.
3.Simon J et al., (2014). J Dance Med Sci, 18.
4.Mehta J et al., (2015). IJPESH, 1, 3-7. |
| ผู้เขียน |
|
| การประเมินบทความ (Peer Review) |
มีผู้ประเมินอิสระ |
| มีการเผยแพร่ในระดับ |
นานาชาติ |
| รูปแบบ Proceeding |
Abstract |
| รูปแบบการนำเสนอ |
Poster |
| เป็นส่วนหนึ่งของวิทยานิพนธ์ |
เป็น |
| ผลงานที่นำเสนอได้รับรางวัล |
ไม่ได้รับรางวัล |
| แนบไฟล์ |
|
| Citation |
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
การเผยแพร่ในรูปของบทความวารสารทางวิชาการ
English